MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408747862 · doi:10.62754/joe.v3i8.6655

A Nationwide Analysis of the Correlation Between Work Environment and Nurses’ Job Satisfaction in Saudi Arabia's Government Hospitals

2024· article· en· W4408747862 on OpenAlexaff
Hallah Mofadi, Talahi Almarwani, Nawal Mohammed Al Anazi, Nourah Obaid S.Alotaibi, Dalal Othman Adawi, Fatamah Nasser A Al Nfeeli, Razan Khalid Alsuayed, Njoud Ali Al Tharawi, Ghaziel Owayli Aloufi, Eman Saeed Al Marashi, Laila Matrouk Al-Dalbahi, Mona Mordhi Alenazi, Nouf Eid Alhowite, Hanan Al Ahmari, Afaf Mufadhi Alrimali

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecohumanism · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJob satisfactionGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)PsychologyWork environmentNursingMedicineSocial psychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The conditions that nurses experience at work constitute an essential factor for maintaining staff satisfaction along with current employee retention rates in hospitals. Stress and burnout together with other workplace issues have intensified the worry about healthcare employee retention. The working environment strongly shapes nurse job satisfaction while also influencing their professional retention decisions. The comprehension of these underlying factors represents an essential requirement for creating methods that enhance caregiving staff stability as well as workplace conditions. Aim: The research seeks to assess different elements of workplace environment for their impact on job satisfaction among nursing staff in Saudi Arabia. This research seeks to discover critical workplace satisfaction elements that will allow developing better retention and workplace condition enhancement strategies in Saudi governmental hospitals. Methods: The work environment assessment alongside nurse satisfaction measurements focused on 375 staff members from Saudi Arabian governmental hospitals through a cross-sectional design. Participants accessed and completed a self-serving online questionnaire for data collection which included both the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index and the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Data researchers employed the SPSS software for their information analyses. Results: Workers in nursing positions showed positive opinions about their workplace atmosphere particularly regarding basic nursing care delivery alongside physician collegiality. Staffing levels alongside resources came under severe dissatisfaction from respondents who numbered 18% in these areas. Women and qualified personnel with higher pay rates demonstrated distinct perspectives toward their working conditions and satisfaction according to One-Way ANOVA results. The work environment in nursing turned out to be a strong predictor of job satisfaction since it explained 37.1% of variation in nurse satisfaction levels according to multiple regression tests. Conclusion: The research demonstrates that work environment conditions significantly affect nurse satisfaction within Saudi Arabian governmental hospitals. The work environment displays some strengths but nurses require higher staffing levels together with better resource availability and enhanced compensation to reach full satisfaction and minimize attrition rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EcohumanismSame topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207