MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408747917 · doi:10.1016/j.microb.2025.100306

The application of a viability real-time PCR assay to detect viable Salmonella spp. in diarrheal stools: A spiked-stool study

2025· article· en· W4408747917 on OpenAlexafffund
Surangi H. Thilakarathna, Linda Chui

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Microbe · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsProvincial Laboratory of Public HealthUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Precision LaboratoriesAlberta Health Services
KeywordsSalmonellaDiarrheal diseaseMicrobiologyDiarrheaFecesVirologyDiarrheal diseasesBiologyMedicineBacteriaGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Viability PCR (vPCR) is a development of real-time PCR where, a viability dye is used to irreversibly remove DNA from compromised or dead cells to selectively amplify live cell DNA. A vPCR assay using PMAxx™ as the viability dye was tested on Salmonella Enteritidis-spiked diarrheal stools to study the effects of stool concentration (5, 10 and 20 %) and PMAxx™ treatment conditions on the vPCR assay. Three replicates were used for each stool concentration, stool type and spiked cell concentration. A higher PMAxx™ concentration or an extended dark incubation time did not improve (heat-killed) HK-cell removal (Ct values for 100 μM/10 min vs 200 μM/30 min were 29.3 ± 1.6 vs 28.7 ± 0.9 for pooled liquid stool and 30.0 ± 1.3 vs 28.0 ± 1.4 for pooled semi solid stools respectively for 10 8 CFU/mL HK-cells). Spiked pooled liquid stool consisted of less stool matter and HK-cell DNA removal (Ct values ∼22, 28, 32 for 10 9 , 10 8 , and 10 7 CFU/mL) and live cell DNA detection (Ct values ∼16, 22, 30 for 10 8 , 10 6 , and 10 4 CFU/mL) was similar across the 3 stool concentrations. On the other hand, more stool matter in spiked pooled semi solid stool interfered with the vPCR assay and removed less HK-cell DNA (Ct values ∼27 vs 31 for 5 % vs 20 % stools with 10 8 CFU/mL) and detected less live cell DNA (Ct values ∼26 vs 21 for 5 % vs 20 % stools with 10 6 CFU/mL) at higher stool concentrations. Consequently, 5 % stool suspensions served best for spiked stool experiments overall to minimize false positive and false negative results. Although the Salmonella spp. positive stool (n = 20) concentration did not significantly affect the PCR or vPCR results overall, comparisons between stool concentrations of each stool showed better vPCR assay performance at low soft solid stool concentrations, i.e 5 %. Small sample size with focus on a single enteric pathogen and considering 2 types of stool consistencies are limitations of this study. This study explored the opportunity of using vPCR as a viability assessment tool when culture confirmation is unavailable in a clinical diagnostic world. • Viability real-time PCR can assess bacterial pathogen viability in clinical stools. • Stool matter and consistency can interfere with the PCR and vPCR assay performance. • Low spiked-stool concentrations (5 %) minimized false positives and false negatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe MicrobeSame topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207