MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4408757269 · doi:10.1111/hdi.13231

Associations Between Type of Hemodialysis Access and Pulmonary Hypertension: A Single‐Center Retrospective Cohort

2025· article· en· W4408757269 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammad Umair Jahngir, Christine De Antonis, Rizwan Rabbani, Rabia Ahmed, Avrum Gillespie

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary hypertensionHemodialysisInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyKidney diseaseCardiologyCohortSurgerySingle Center

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension affects patients with hemodialysis-dependent end-stage kidney failure; however, the estimated prevalence varies greatly due to the underutilization of right heart catheterization and the evolving diagnostic criteria of pulmonary hypertension. Pulmonary hypertension in end-stage kidney failure is often attributed to arteriovenous (AV) access; therefore, we hypothesized that patients with AV fistula/graft would have a greater prevalence of pulmonary hypertension on right heart catheterization compared to those with central venous (CV) catheter accesses. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, we identified and randomly sampled patients from July 2012 to August 2022 receiving hemodialysis for ≥ 3 months and who underwent right heart catheterization, using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Pulmonary hypertension was defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg. Our primary outcome was the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension among patients with AV fistula/graft versus CV hemodialysis access, tested with descriptive statistics. We evaluated survival as a secondary outcome using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 3834 patient charts were extracted. Overall, 444 charts were randomly sampled, resulting in 137 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 63.8 ± 10.5 years, and 62% were male. The most common etiology of end-stage kidney failure was diabetic kidney disease (57.7%). Eighty percent of end-stage kidney failure patients had pulmonary hypertension; however, the type of hemodialysis access was not associated with pulmonary hypertension (85% CV catheter vs. 79.5% AV access, p = 0.59). Patients with pulmonary hypertension had lower hemoglobin (9.6 ± 0.8 vs. 11.2 ± 1.3 g/dL, p < 0.0001) and serum albumin (2.3 ± 0.9 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6 g/dL, p < 0.0001) than those without pulmonary hypertension. Those with pulmonary hypertension had an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 2.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-4.61; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our findings show a high burden of pulmonary hypertension among this heterogeneous cohort of end-stage kidney failure patients, with no association between pulmonary hypertension and the type of hemodialysis access. This study highlights the need for prospective investigations incorporating current strategies for pulmonary hypertension diagnosis and treatment among the dialysis-dependent population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→