MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Connecting Knowledge to People: Plain Language Summaries from the North Atlantic Forum

2025· article· en· W4408764478 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lucas Berek, Ryan Gibson, Laurie Brinklow, Sheila Downer

Bibliographic record

VenueRural Review Ontario Rural Planning Development and Policy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlain languagePlain EnglishCoastal plainWorld Wide WebLinguisticsComputer scienceGeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2024 North Atlantic Forum was a collegial assembly to further the discussion surrounding public policy, regional development, place-based development and expanding the importance of identity and cultural development. Researchers, students, community development practitioners, and government representatives from across the North Atlantic region gathered to present findings, participate in panels and field trips. To amplify knowledge mobilization presented at the conference a series of plain language summaries were created to advance the discussion in various topics surrounding rural development and rural businesses. This initiative created a series of plain language research summaries on innovative approaches in building and maintaining sustainable rural livelihoods in a post-pandemic environment. This initiative mobilizes knowledge shared at the 2024 North Atlantic Forum to rural stakeholders in Ontario, ensuring this critical information reaches rural communities and businesses. The series of research summaries focus on topics of solar energy, food security, heritage tourism, housing, entrepreneurialism, and economic development. The purpose of the summaries is to amplify knowledge sharing, particularly among individuals/organizations that may not have been able to attend the conference. This initiative disseminated new knowledge outputs to key rural Ontario stakeholders, such as local governments, economic development actors, nonprofit organizations, and businesses. The research summaries generate an alternative tool in facilitating an accessible transfer of key messages in research while providing a pathway to practice and participation for rural community members at-large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRural Review Ontario Rural Planning Development and PolicySame topicHistorical Linguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207