Emulation of Synaptic Plasticity in WO<sub>3</sub>‐Based Ion‐Gated Transistors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Neuromorphic systems, inspired by the human brain, promise significant advancements in computational efficiency and power consumption by integrating processing and memory functions, thereby addressing the von Neumann bottleneck. This paper explores the synaptic plasticity of a WO 3 ‐based ion‐gated transistor (IGT) in [EMIM][TFSI] and a 0.1 mol L −1 LiTFSI in [EMIM][TFSI] for neuromorphic computing applications. Cyclic voltammetry (CV), transistor characteristics, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) force–distance (FD) profiling analyses reveal that Li + brings about ion intercalation, together with higher mobility and conductance, and slower response time (τ). WO 3 IGTs exhibit spike amplitude‐dependent plasticity (SADP), spike number‐dependent plasticity (SNDP), spike duration‐dependent plasticity (SDDP), frequency‐dependent plasticity (FDP), and paired‐pulse facilitation (PPF), which are all crucial for mimicking biological synaptic functions and understanding how to achieve different types of plasticity in the same IGT. The findings underscore the importance of selecting the appropriate ionic medium to optimize the performance of synaptic transistors, enabling the development of neuromorphic systems capable of adaptive learning and real‐time processing, which are essential for applications in artificial intelligence (AI).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it