MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408786371 · doi:10.1002/ecy.70065

A seascape dichotomy in the role of small consumers for coral reef energy fluxes

2025· article· en· W4408786371 on OpenAlexafffund
Simon J. Brandl, Helen F. Yan, Jordan M. Casey, Nina M. D. Schiettekatte, Julianna J. Renzi, Alexandre Mercière, Fabien Morat, Isabelle M. Côté, Valériano Parravicini

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersAustralian Research CouncilFondation BNP ParibasNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science Foundation
KeywordsReefEcologyCoral reefSeascapeBenthic zoneBiomass (ecology)Trophic levelEcosystemBiologyFisheryHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biogeochemical fluxes through ecological communities underpin the functioning of ecosystems worldwide. These fluxes are often heavily influenced by small-bodied consumers, such as insects, worms, mollusks, or small vertebrates, which transfer energy and nutrients from autotrophic sources to larger animals. Although coral reefs are one of the most productive ecosystems in the world, we know relatively little about how small consumers make energy available to larger predators and how their roles may vary across reefs. Here, we use community-scale collections of small, bottom-dwelling ("cryptobenthic") reef fishes along with size spectrum analyses, stable isotopes, and demographic modeling to examine their role in harnessing and transferring carbon in two distinct coral reef habitats. Using a comprehensive dataset from Mo'orea (French Polynesia), we demonstrate that, despite only being separated by a narrow reef crest, forereef and backreef habitats harbor distinct communities of cryptobenthic fishes that play vastly divergent roles in carbon transfer. Forereef communities in Mo'orea are depauperate, largely consisting of predatory and planktivorous species that have comparatively high standing biomass (both individually and collectively). In these communities, the combination of size spectra and isotope values suggests important contributions of pelagic subsidies, but the rate of biomass production and turnover (i.e., the rate at which biomass is replenished) is relatively low. In contrast, cryptobenthic fish communities in the backreef are characterized by high abundances of the smallest bodied species, forming a traditional bottom-heavy trophic pyramid that is fueled by benthic autotrophs. In these communities, benthic productivity fuels rapid production and turnover of fish biomass, while pelagic energy channels are notably less productive. Our integrative approach demonstrates the utility of combining multiple methods (e.g., isotopically informed demographic models) to trace energy fluxes through small consumer communities in complex ecosystems. Furthermore, our results highlight that coral reef productivity dynamics are highly habitat-dependent and the role of the smallest coral reef consumers may be most pronounced in shallow systems with limited connectivity to the open ocean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcologySame topicCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesFrench-language works237,207