Deep Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing Route Planning in Urban Traffic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urban traffic networks are efficient route design problems due to the intricacy and dynamic character of contemporary cities. Conventional methods hamper real time adjustment to continually changing traffic conditions, thereby providing suboptimal routes, a greater burden on the roadways, and greater air pollution. This thesis presents a novel deep reinforcement learning (DRL) method to optimize the route planning for urban traffic networks. With this rendering of real time traffic data, we use DRL to make autonomous decisions to reduce travel time and congestion of routes. One advantage of using sophisticated neural networks for feature extraction and policy learning is that, since the model is so adaptable to changing traffic patterns, the model guarantees that. And, in comparison to common routing algorithms, the results of simulations using real world traffic data show that this method is able to greatly enhance route efficiency and overall traffic flow management. The suggested DRL based system is feasible as a smart city program based on intelligent transportation system which can scale to grand metropolitan regions. The research presents that DRL can enhance the commuter run experience, reduce the environmental effect, and alter urban transportation. Future study will also investigate how this system can be better optimized when integrated with traffic infrastructure enabled by the Internet of Things.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".