MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408804832 · doi:10.3389/frbee.2025.1565929

Editorial: Applied bee science and technology transfer

2025· editorial· en· W4408804832 on OpenAlexaff
Nuria Morfín, Karina Antúnez, Patricia Aldea-Sánchez, M. Marta Guarna

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bee Science · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTechnology transferEngineering ethicsEngineeringComputer scienceKnowledge management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Honey bees (Apis mellifera L) are essential contributors to food production as main pollinators in 18 agricultural ecosystems. However, beekeeping faces many challenges related to a variety of stressors 19 that affect the survivorship of honey bee colonies and compromise their productivity. For example, 20 the parasitism caused by Varroa destructor is linked to colony losses and low honey production. The 21 adaptability that varroa mites have demonstrated to different environments out of their original range 22and their capacity to cause disease and vector virulent viruses is of extreme concern. Efforts to 23 understand the biology of the parasite, its relationship to viruses, and the discovery of novel methods 24 to control its population growth have been instrumental in supporting the beekeeping industry. and hygienic behaviours and found dysregulation of some genes in bee's heads and bodies, 60advancing the understanding of molecular mechanisms behind varroa resistance and the possible 61 implementation of biomarkers in selective breeding. 62Part of an IPM strategy for varroa mite control is the use of organic acaricides, like oxalic acid. 63Tellarini Prieto et al. addressed one key question that beekeepers using oxalic acid vapour have: the 64 product's toxicity. Although the authors reported a temporary increase in adult bee mortality, they 65 found no effects on colony or queen health when using 20 g of oxalic acid. The study could have 66 implications for label recommendations and the effective use of oxalic acid vapor for varroa control. 67Additionally, Killiam et al. explored the role of honey bee gut microbiota in promoting honey bee 68 health. Specifically, they reviewed and hypothesized how supplementation of food with lactic acid 69 bacteria could influence social behaviours, enhancing hive health or performance. 70Lastly, laboratory research has led to potential treatments for various diseases that affect honey bees, 71 including varroa mites, but their application at the hive level is challenging for many reasons, such as 72 the effective distribution of therapeutic agents within the colony. Tropilaelaps mites. The use of new technologies and innovative science can greatly increase bee 83 health and improve honey bee productivity, which will benefit agricultural systems. We are grateful 84 to the authors who contributed to this research topic, the reviewers, and the editorial team.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Bee ScienceSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207