MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408805190 · doi:10.1508/cytologia.90.29

Elucidation of the phylogenetic relationships among <i>Alpinia</i> species native to the Nansei Islands, Japan

2025· article· en· W4408805190 on OpenAlexaff
Kiyotaka Nagaki, Mari Narusaka, Yoshihiro Narusaka

Bibliographic record

VenueCYTOLOGIA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAlpiniaPhylogenetic treePhylogenetic relationshipBotanyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Alpinia species (A. intermedia, A. zerumbet, A. formosana, A. uraiensis, and unidentified strains native to the Daito Islands), which are native to the Nansei Islands, Japan are ornamental plants that can be used as resources to produce seasonings and antibacterial and antiviral substances. Despite the usefulness of these plants, little scientific research has been conducted on their phylogenetic relationships. In this study, their phylogenetic relationships were examined based on genomic and chloroplast DNA polymorphisms, repetitive sequence abundance, and cytogenetic perspectives. The results indicated that A. formosana is most likely the outcome of a hybrid of A. zerumbet and A. intermedia, and the unidentified strains native to the Daito Islands are the outcomes of a hybrid of A. zerumbet and A. uraiensis. Immunostaining with a newly produced anti-centromere-specific histone H3 (CENH3) antibody revealed that the number of chromosomes in these species was 2n=48.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCYTOLOGIASame topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207