The effects of post-hypnotic suggestion on muscular performance: an EMG study on the forearm during a static handgrip endurance test
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypnosis is known for its effects on various psychophysiological phenomena, such as perception, emotions, fatigue, and muscle strength. Besides the conflicting evidence on the influence of hypnosis on muscle performance, its role in influencing central or peripheral fatigue remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated the effects of a single hypnosis session, terminated with a precise posthypnotic suggestion, on muscle strength, endurance, and myoelectric activity. Thirty participants (M = 17, F = 13) were divided into a Control (CO) and a Hypnosis group (HY). Handgrip strength and endurance were tested in three pre- and post-training phases: i) holding the handgrip as strongly as possible for 5 seconds (i.e. a measure of muscle strength); ii) after a 1-minute passive pause, holding the handgrip as strongly and as long as possible (i.e. a measure of muscle endurance); iii) after a further 1-minute pause, the first trial was repeated. All these procedures were repeated after a 30-minute rest period during which the CO could use the time freely, the HY was subjected to the hypnosis session. During the experimental procedures, surface EMG was applied to the forearm muscles to assess neuromuscular fatigue. Regardless of a stronger improvement between pre- and post-processing in the HY, we found no interaction effect between the groups. This suggests that a single post-hypnotic suggestion is not sufficient to significantly increase the force exerted over time (i.e., impulse), and that the observed HY improvement may be influenced by highly susceptible participants. Furthermore, despite this difference, we found no change in forearm muscle activation. Our results show that a single hypnosis session negligibly altered muscular performance. These findings contribute to the debate on the topic of hypnosis and fatigue but require further investigation, given the observed tendency of the hypnosis group to delay fatigue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it