Familial Mediterranean Fever; Recent Advances, Future Prospectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is the prototype and most common autoinflammatory disease that is particularly frequent in populations originating from the Mediterranean basin. It is characterized by episodes of recurrent inflammation lasting 2–3 days. Colchicine is the mainstay therapy, which decreases the number of attacks and eventually prevents amyloidosis, the most worrisome complication of uncontrolled FMF. It is an autosomal recessive disease. The high rate of MEFV gene mutations in specific populations has been discussed as the result of an evolutionary advantage. Tel-Hashomer criteria were the first set of criteria primarily designed for adults. Recently, the Eurofever/PRINTO group has validated a new set of classification criteria for FMF, including clinical and genetic variables. Colchicine intolerance is an important problem and limits the ability to reach an effective dose. In these groups of patients, adding an alternative biological treatment (anti IL-1 agents) is recommended. Several tools such as FMF50, AIDAI, ADDI, ISSF and MASIF have been proposed to evaluate and quantify the disease activity and organ damage. Ongoing research should clarify the exact mechanisms causing FMF attacks and phenotypic variabilities between the patients; further translational research requires the implementation of proteomics and epigenetics signatures to elucidate the pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".