MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408830829 · doi:10.5194/amt-18-1461-2025

Solar background radiation temperature calibration of a pure rotational Raman lidar

2025· article· en· W4408830829 on OpenAlexafffund
Vasura Jayaweera, R. J. Sica, Giovanni Martucci, Alexander Haefele

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric measurement techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsLidarCalibrationRadiationRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceRaman spectroscopyPhysicsAtmospheric sciencesMaterials scienceOpticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Raman lidars are an important tool for measuring important atmospheric parameters including water vapour content and temperature in the troposphere and stratosphere. These measurements enable climatology studies and trend analyses to be performed. To detect long-term trends it is critical that the calibration of the system and the monitoring of its associated uncertainties are as reliable and continuous as possible. Here we demonstrate a new methodology to derive calibration coefficients for a rotational Raman temperature lidar. We use solar background measurements taken by the rotational Raman channels of the Raman Lidar for Meteorological Observations (RALMO) located at the Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology (MeteoSwiss) in Payerne, Switzerland, to calculate a relative calibration as a function of time, which is made an absolute calibration by requiring only a single external calibration, in our case with an ensemble of radiosonde flights. This approach was verified using an external time series of coincident radiosonde measurements. We employed the calibration technique on historical measurements that used a Licel data acquisition system and established a calibration time series spanning 2011 to 2015 using both the radiosonde-based external and solar-background-based internal methods. Our results show that using the background calibration technique reduces the mean bias of the calibration by an average of 0.5 K across the troposphere compared to using the local radiosoundings. Furthermore, it demonstrates the background calibration's ability to adjust and maintain continuous calibration values even amidst sudden changes in the system, which sporadic external calibration could miss. This approach ensures that climatological averages and trends remain unaffected by the drift effects commonly associated with using daily operational radiosondes. It also allows a lidar not co-located with a routine external source to be continuously calibrated once an initial external calibration is done. Furthermore, the technique works for temperature retrievals using both the optimal estimation method and the traditional temperature algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric measurement techniquesSame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207