MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408833196 · doi:10.1080/14796694.2025.2476929

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response with darolutamide in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and its impact on treatment outcomes in the ARASENS trial: a plain language summary

2025· article· en· W4408833196 on OpenAlexaff
Fred Saad, Maha Hussain, Bertrand Tombal, Karim Fizazi, Ken Mastris, Thomas Flannery, Matthew R. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer FoundationUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenOncologyInternal medicineAntigenCancerImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plain Language SummaryWhat is this summary about?This summary describes the results from an additional (or post-hoc) analysis of the ARASENS trial in which researchers studied the impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response on treatment outcomes, including how long patients lived, in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). mHSPC is a form of prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of the body but can be treated with hormone therapy.The ARASENS trial included 1,305 patients with mHSPC. In this trial, combining darolutamide with two other medications called androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel increased the chances of survival and lowered the risk of death by 32.5%. The percentage of patients reporting medical problems, also called adverse events, was similar to those who received placebo with ADT and docetaxel.What were the PSA results?More than double the patients who received darolutamide, ADT, and docetaxel achieved a deep PSA response compared with those who received placebo, ADT, and docetaxel.Patients who received darolutamide with ADT and docetaxel had more time before their PSA levels increased (durable PSA response) compared with those who received a placebo with ADT and docetaxel.Compared with patients who did not achieve a deep PSA response in the darolutamide group, patients who had a deep PSA response lived longer, had more time before their cancer stopped responding to hormone treatment such as ADT, and had more time before their PSA levels increased.What do these results mean?These results show an important link between a deep PSA response and improved treatment outcomes. They also highlight the importance of monitoring PSA levels and aiming to achieve a deep PSA response at any time during treatment for mHSPC. These findings suggest that triple therapy of darolutamide plus ADT and docetaxel could be considered for all patients with mHSPC, including those with low-volume disease.This is an abstract of the Plain Language Summary of Publication article.View the full Plain Language Summary PDF of this article to read the full-text

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture OncologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207