MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408836821 · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.4c00786

Ultra-efficient Integration of Gene Libraries onto Yeast Cytosolic Plasmids

2025· letter· en· W4408836821 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alexander Pisera, Yutong Yu, Rory L. Williams, Chang C. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Synthetic Biology · 2025
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer InstituteHewitt FoundationNational Eye Institute
KeywordsPlasmidYeastGeneBiologyCytosolSynthetic biologyGeneticsComputational biologyBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

diversification of GOIs encoded on a cytosolic plasmid (p1), has been successfully used to drive numerous protein engineering campaigns. However, OrthoRep-based GOI evolution has almost always started from single GOI sequences, limiting the number of locations on a fitness landscape from where evolutionary search begins. Here, we present a simple approach for the high-efficiency integration of GOI libraries onto OrthoRep. By leveraging integrases, we demonstrate recombination of donor DNA onto the cytosolic p1 plasmid at exceptionally high transformation efficiencies, even surpassing the transformation efficiency of standard circular plasmids and linearized plasmid fragments into yeast. We demonstrate our method's utility through the straightforward construction of mock nanobody libraries encoded on OrthoRep, from which rare binders were reliably enriched. Overall, integrase-assisted manipulation of yeast cytosolic plasmids should enhance the versatility of OrthoRep in continuous evolution experiments and support the routine construction of large GOI libraries in yeast, in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Synthetic BiologySame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207