MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408838099 · doi:10.1080/14796694.2025.2474789

Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated KRAS G12C–mutated non–small–cell lung cancer: a plain language summary

2025· article· en· W4408838099 on OpenAlexaff
Adrianus J. de Langen, Melissa L. Johnson, Julien Mazières, Anne‐Marie C. Dingemans, Giannis Mountzios, Miklos Pless, Jürgen Wolf, Martin Schüler, H. Léna, Ferdinandos Skoulidis, Yasuto Yoneshima, Sang‐We Kim, Helena Linardou, Silvia Novello, Anthonie J. van der Wekken, Yuanbin Chen, Solange Peters, Enriqueta Felip, Benjamin Solomon, Suresh S. Ramalingam, Christophe Dooms, Colin R. Lindsay, Carlos Gil Ferreira, Normand Blais, Cynthia C. Obiozor, Yang Wang, Bhakti Mehta, Tracy Varrieur, Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith, Björn Stollenwerk, David Waterhouse, Luis Paz‐Ares

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersAmgen
KeywordsMedicineDocetaxelKRASOncologyInternal medicineLung cancerCancerCancer researchColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plain Language SummaryWhat is this summary about?The CodeBreaK 200 clinical study included patients with a type of lung cancer called non–small-cell lung cancer that has spread outside the lung (advanced) and had a particular change (mutation) in the KRAS gene. This mutation leads to the mutated protein called KRAS G12C and can lead to lung cancer. The CodeBreaK 200 clinical study looked at whether treatment with sotorasib works better and has fewer side effects than docetaxel. Sotorasib has accelerated approval or full approval for use in over 50 countries for patients with previouslytreated advanced KRAS G12C–mutated non–small-cell lung cancer.What did investigators find?There were 171 adults in the sotorasib group and 174 in the docetaxel group. The median time that patients in the sotorasib group whose disease was no worse or who did not die was 5.6 months. For patients in the docetaxel group, this was 4.5 months. After 1 year, 25% of patients in the sotorasib group had disease that was no worse or did not die. This happened in 100% of patients in the docetaxel group. In total, 48 out of 171 patients (28%) in the sotorasib group had a positive effect to treatment, and their tumors shrunk in size by at least 30% or disappeared. This happened in 23 out of 174 patients (13%) in the docetaxel group. Additionally, 141 out of 171 patients (82%) in the sotorasib group had tumors that either remained stable or shrunk in size. This happened in 105 out of 174 patients (60%) in the docetaxel group. Patients in both the sotorasib and docetaxel groups had a similar median survival (10.6 months in the sotorasib group compared with 11.3 months in the docetaxel group). Almost all patients treated with sotorasib or docetaxel had side effects. They were severe in 56 out of 169 patients (33%) receiving sotorasib and 61 out of 151 patients (40%) receiving docetaxel.What is the key takeaway?Sotorasib is an effective treatment for previously–treated patients with advanced KRAS G12C–mutated non–small-cell lung cancer.This is an abstract of the Plain Language Summary of Publication article.View the full Plain Language Summary PDF of this article to read the full-text

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture OncologySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207