Assessment of frailty status in non-geriatric peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare frailty status in non-geriatric hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and to assess whether there is a difference between frail and non-frail patients in HD and PD patients. Methods: 28 PD and 28 HD patients were included in this cross-sectional study. The Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) was used to assess frailty status, including questions on cognition, general health status, addiction, social support, medication, nutrition, depression and sphincter continence, and a physical test assessing standing and walking. Results: The mean age was 51.3+9.6 years and 24 (43%) of the individuals were female. There was no difference between HD and PD patients in terms of EFS score. Twelve (43%) of HD patients and 10 (36%) of PD patients were found to be frail (p=0.784). There was a positive correlation between age and EFS score in both HD and PD patients (r=0.896, p
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".