γ-tubulin mediates DNA double-strand break repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA pose a critical threat to genomic integrity, potentially leading to the onset and progression of various diseases, including cancer. Cellular responses to such lesions entail sophisticated repair mechanisms primarily mediated by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). Interestingly, the efficient recruitment of repair proteins and completion of DSB repair likely involve complex, inter-organelle communication and coordination of cellular components. In this study, we report a role of γ-tubulin in DSB repair. γ-tubulin is a major microtubule nucleation factor governing microtubule dynamics. We show that γ-tubulin is recruited to the site of DNA damage and is required for efficient DSB repair via both NHEJ and HR. Suppression of γ-tubulin impedes DNA repair and exacerbates DNA damage accumulation. Furthermore, γ-tubulin mediates the mobilization and formation of DNA damage foci, which serve as repair centers, thereby facilitating the recruitment of HR and NHEJ repair proteins on damaged chromatin. Finally, pharmacological inhibition of γ-tubulin enhances the cytotoxic effect of DNA-damaging agents, consistent with the DNA repair function of γ-tubulin, and underscoring the potential of its therapeutic intervention in cancer therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".