MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408845928 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkaf085

Comparing serotype coverage of pneumococcal vaccines with PCV21 (V116), a new 21-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine, and the epidemiology of its eight unique <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> serotypes (15A, 15C, 16F, 23A, 23B, 24F, 31 and 35B) causing invasive pneumococcal disease in adult patients in Canada: SAVE study, 2018–21

2025· article· en· W4408845928 on OpenAlexafffundabout
John J. Schellenberg, Heather J. Adam, Melanie Baxter, James A. Karlowsky, Alyssa Golden, Irene Martín, George G. Zhanel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersMerck CanadaPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsSerotypeStreptococcus pneumoniaePneumococcal conjugate vaccineVirologyPneumococcal infectionsConjugate vaccineMedicineStreptococcaceaeConjugateMicrobiologyPneumococcal vaccineImmunologyBiologyAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: V116 is a novel 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) intended for use in adults. OBJECTIVES: To estimate current V116 serotype coverage in adult patients in Canada compared with PCV15, PCV20 and PPSV23 vaccines, and to describe isolate demographics for the eight unique serotypes (15A, 15C, 16F, 23A, 23B, 24F, 31 and 35B) covered by V116. METHODS: From 2018 to 2021 inclusive, the SAVE study collected 5854 invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) isolates as part of a collaboration between the Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance and the Public Health Agency of Canada-National Microbiology Laboratory. Serotypes were determined by Quellung reaction and antimicrobial susceptibility testing performed using the CLSI broth microdilution method. RESULTS: For adult patients (≥18 years), adults 50-64 years and adults ≥65 years, respectively, IPD isolate coverage was PCV15 (42.7%; 41.0%, 39.8%), PCV20 (59.0%; 60.2%, 52.2%), PPSV23 (70.4%; 75.1%, 60.0%), V116 (78.9%; 76.3%, 81.5%) and V116 plus PCV20 (92.2%; 91.0%, 89.3%). The eight unique V116 serotypes accounted for 19.7% and 26.8% of IPD isolates from adults and adults ≥65 years, respectively. Among the eight unique V116 serotypes, 15A and 23A demonstrated the highest rates of MDR (17.0% and 10.2%, respectively); 6.7% of 15A isolates were XDR. CONCLUSIONS: V116 provided significantly (P < 0.05) greater coverage than PCV15, PCV20 and PPSV23 for adults, including older adults, across all Canadian geographic regions, and against IPD isolates with common antimicrobial resistance phenotypes, including MDR. The eight unique V116 serotypes accounted for a higher proportion of IPD isolate serotypes in patients aged ≥65 years than younger adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207