Nb-Ta mineralization in a metaluminous-weakly peraluminous magmatic system: Constraints from the chemical compositions and Hf isotopes of columbite-group minerals in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mineralization of Nb and Ta associated with metaluminous-weakly peraluminous (MWP) magmatic systems has gained increasing attention in recent years, particularly with the recognition of several major Nb-Ta deposits in China originating from MWP granites. Columbite-group minerals (CGMs), the key ore minerals for Nb-Ta, serve as crucial indicators for understanding the mechanisms underlying this mineralization. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of major and trace elements, as well as Hf isotopes, of CGMs from seven Nb-Ta deposits in China, related to MWP systems. We compared these CGMs with those from deposits associated with strongly peraluminous (SP) magmatic systems to uncover the distinctions in their mineralization processes. Statistical analyses, including elemental plots and partial least squares discriminant analysis, revealed significant variations in CGMs between the MWP system and the SP system. The earliest crystallized CGMs from MWP systems exhibit higher Nb2O5 contents resulting from higher Nb concentration in the initial magma and therefore do not need to undergo as high a degree of fractional crystallization as those in SP systems do. Additional geochemical markers further differentiate MWP magma sources, including higher Sc, total REE, and Y contents, as well as Th/U atomic ratios, along with lower Li contents and Y/Ho atomic ratios. As magma evolves, the Zr/Hf atomic ratios and total REE contents decrease, while Ta/(Nb+Ta) atomic ratios increase. Additionally, the influence of melt-crystal-fluid interactions on REE characteristics in late-stage CGMs cannot be ignored. The Hf isotopic compositions of CGMs indicate that the Nb-Ta mineralization in South China during the Early Cretaceous (∼140–120 Ma), associated with MWP systems, is attributed to contributions from a deep material source within an extensional tectonic setting. The differences in chemical compositions, U-Pb ages, and Hf isotopes of CGMs between the two systems offer valuable insights for heavy mineral prospecting to locate Nb-Ta deposits related to MWP granites in regional exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".