External stress, formaldehyde, and schizophrenia: a new mouse model for mental illness research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although MK801-induced NMDA receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction mimics schizophrenia symptoms, the exact factors causing NMDAR inhibition are unknown. Unexpectedly, external stress elicits formaldehyde (FA) generation; FA can induce depression and cognitive impairments by blocking NMDARs. This study explores using FA injection to establish a schizophrenia-like model in mice. Here, we reported that external stress-derived FA induces schizophrenia-like behaviors. Four experimental methods were used to induce schizophrenia-like symptoms in wild-type mice: double electrode stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), microinjection of FA or tetrahydroisoquinoline (TIQ) into the VTA, and intraperitoneal injection of MK801. Then the metabolic levels of FA and dopamine (DA) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and VTA were quantified using ELISA kits. We found that external stress-electrical stimulation via VTA caused schizophrenia-like behaviors, including despairing behavior as measured by the tail suspension test, anhedonia as evaluated by the sucrose preference test, stereotypical behavior as assessed by the marble burying test (MBT), anxiety-like behavior as measured by the open-field test and memory deficit as detected by the Y-maze. These behaviors correlated with increased DA and TIQ levels in the VTA and decreased DA levels in the PFC. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) confirmed TIQ formation from FA and DA. Furthermore, injecting TIQ into the VTA induced schizophrenia-like symptoms in mice, marked by higher FA and lower DA levels in the PFC than control mice. Strikingly, injecting FA into the VTA as well as administering MK-801 induced schizophrenia-like behaviors associated with reduced DA levels and low activity of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and monoamine oxidase (MAO) in the PFC. Hence, microinfusion of FA into the VTA can be used to prepare schizophrenia-like changes mouse model, suggesting that stress-derived FA may act as an endogenous trigger of schizophrenia-like changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".