Impact of co-packaging oral rehydration salts and zinc on diarrhoea treatment dispensing behaviour in selected rural health facilities in Zambia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Co-packaged oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc for the treatment of childhood diarrhoea was added to the World Health Organization's Essential Medicines List in 2019, to help address the persistently high mortality and morbidity associated with diarrhoea in children under 5 years of age and the low uptake of the recommended co-therapy. However, little empirical evidence exists on how co-packaging impacts dispensing practices in low-resource settings. Here, we present findings from a study conducted in Mongu District, Zambia, aimed at evaluating the effect of introducing a co-pack containing ORS and zinc on dispensing behaviour at rural health facilities. Data from dispensing records were collected before and after the introduction of the co-pack, in 2016 and 2017, respectively, from seven government health facilities. We used multilevel logistic regression to account for the fact that the data is clustered by health facility and to address potential intraclass correlations in dispensing practices within the same facility. The results indicate an overall odds ratio of 8.42 (95% CI: 5.47-12.9) for the dispensing of both ORS and zinc together, for 2017 versus 2016, along with a significant reduction in the variability of dispensing practices between facilities (once the co-pack factor was included). Additionally, the data suggest that less well-resourced facilities experienced the greatest benefit from the introduction of the co-pack. These findings provide valuable insights into the potential of co-packaging to foster appropriate diarrhoea-treatment dispensing practices in resource-limited settings. As such, they provide a foundation for further research to validate them on geographical scales beyond the district level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".