Rationale and Study Design to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Minocycline in Patients with Moderate to Severe Acute Ischaemic Stroke (EMPHASIS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammation and blood-brain barrier disruption may contribute to the pathogenesis of ischaemic stroke. Minocycline was shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects by attenuating microglial activation and protecting blood-brain barrier in preclinical studies. Previous small-scale clinical studies have suggested that minocycline may have a potential beneficial effect on prognosis in acute ischaemic stroke. However, the efficacy and safety of minocycline in patients with acute ischaemic stroke need to be further confirmed. STUDY AIMS: We designed the study, Efficacy and Safety of Minocycline in Patients with Moderate to Severe Acute Ischaemic Stroke (EMPHASIS), to evaluate the effect of minocycline in improving the functional outcome and the drug safety in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: The EMPHASIS study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aiming to recruit patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Patients who had ischaemic stroke within 72 hours of onset, a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score between 4 and 25 and Ia≤1 (moderate-to-severe) will be randomly allocated to either minocycline or placebo groups in a 1:1 ratio. Patients will receive minocycline (or placebo) with a loading dose of 200 mg, and subsequent 100 mg every 12 hours for 4 days. All patients will receive routine guideline-based treatment. The primary efficacy outcome is an excellent functional outcome assessed by the proportion of modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90±7 days. The main safety outcomes include the number of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at 24±2 hours and 6±1 days. DISCUSSION: The EMPHASIS trial is the first phase III trial to investigate whether minocycline is effective and safe in improving functional outcome at 90 days in patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischaemic stroke. The data generated may provide valuable evidence of a potential anti-inflammation treatment for ischaemic stroke.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.046 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".