MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408866813 · doi:10.3103/s0005105525700311

Neural Network Architecture of Embodied Intelligence

2024· article· en· W4408866813 on OpenAlexaff
A. R. Nurutdinov

Bibliographic record

VenueAutomatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAction Observation and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbodied cognitionArchitectureComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkCognitive sciencePsychologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In recent years, advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning have been driven by advances in the development of large language models (LLMs) that are based on deep neural networks. At the same time, in spite of their substantial capabilities, LLMs have fundamental limitations, such as their spontaneous unreliability in facts and judgments; commission of simple errors that are dissonant with high competence in general; credulity, manifested by a willingness to accept a user’s false claims as true; and lack of knowledge concerning events occurring after training has been completed. Probably the key reason for these limitations is that bioinspired intelligence learning takes place through an assimilation of implicit knowledge in terms of an embodied form of intelligence to solve interactive real-world physical problems. Bioinspired studies of the nervous systems of organisms suggest that the cerebellum, which coordinates movement and maintains balance in human beings, is a prime candidate for uncovering methods of realizing embodied physical intelligence. Its simple, repetitive structure and ability to control complex movements offer hope for the possibility of creating an analog to adaptive neural networks. This paper explores the bioinspired architecture of the cerebellum as a form of analog computational networks that are capable of modeling complex, real-world physical systems. For a simple example, a realization of embodied AI in the form of a multicomponent model of an octopus tentacle is presented that demonstrates the potential for creating adaptive physical systems that learn from and interact with the environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAutomatic Documentation and Mathematical LinguisticsSame topicAction Observation and SynchronizationFrench-language works237,207