Corrigendum: The challenges of urban street trees and how to overcome them
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PAGE \* Arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 3In the published article, the reference for (Fahey et al., 2013) was incorrectly written as: Fahey, T. J., Battles, J. J., Wilson, G. F., Goodale, C. L., Hamburg, S. P., and Ollinger, S. V. (2013). The human and biophysical effects of climate change on US forests. Bio Sci. 63, 757-765. doi: 10.1525Sci. 63, 757-765. doi: 10. /bio.2013.63.9.6 .63.9.6 It should be: Fahey, R. T., Bialecki, M. B., & Carter, D. R. (2013). Tree Growth and Resilience to Extreme Drought Across an Urban Land-use Gradient. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 39(6), 279-285. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2013.036 In the published article, the reference for (Farell et al., 2022) was incorrectly written as: Farell, C., Sisinni, L., Paquette, A., Messier, C., and LeBlanc, A. (2022). Linking the drivers of tree selection with the social and ecological functions of urban forests. Landsc. Urban Plan. 221:104188. doi: 10.1016Plan. 221:104188. doi: 10. /j.landurbplan.2022.104188 .104188 It should be:Farrell, C., Livesley, S.J., Arndt, S.K., Beaumont, L., Burley, H., Ellsworth, D., Esperon-Rodriguez, M., Fletcher, T.D., Gallagher, R., Ossola, A. (2022). Can we integrate ecological approaches to improve plant selection for green infrastructure? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 76 127732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127732 In the published article, the reference for (Fernandes et al., 2019) was incorrectly written as:Fernandes, G. W., Lara-Romero, C., Malaquias, J. V., Oliveira, L. C., and Espirito-Santo, M. M. (2019). Street trees: perceptions and practices of inhabitants of the Montes Claros, MG, Brazil. Urban For. Urban Green. 41, 58-63. doi: 10.1016Green. 41, 58-63. doi: 10. /j.ufug.2019.02.012 .02.012 It should be: 2022). Assessing urban park street tree ecosystem services and their influence on residents' well-being. Urban For. Urban Green. 69:127568. doi: 10.1016Green. 69:127568. doi: 10. /j.ufug.2022.127568 .127568 It should be:Tan, X., Shibata, S., 2022. Factors influencing street tree health in constrained planting spaces: Evidence from Kyoto City, Japan. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 67, 127416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127416. This is already in the references (see below); thus the reference can be deleted.In the published article, the reference for (Sjöman et al., 2012) was incorrectly written as: Sjöman, H., and Busse Nielsen, A. (2012). The effect of different soil types and soil volumes on performance of urban trees in paved areas. Urban For. Urban Green. 11, 425-431. doi: 10.1016Green. 11, 425-431. doi: 10. /j.ufug.2012.07.004 .07.004 It should be: Tabassum, M., Rafiq, M., Zhu, D., Wang, Y., Luo, Y., Yuan, Q., et al. (2021). Urban trees moderate street-level microclimate and enhance pedestrian thermal comfort during heatwave periods. Build. Environ. 200:107999. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107999 It should be:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".