MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408875879 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104535

Pan-cancer clinical and molecular landscape of MTAP deletion in nationwide and international comprehensive genomic data

2025· article· en· W4408875879 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCabinet Office, Government of JapanSwine Innovation PorcJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsCancerGeographyMedicineComputational biologyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Early-phase clinical trials of protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitors as synthetic lethal strategies have shown promising efficacy in methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP)-deleted tumors. To refine and expand this promising therapeutic approach within the framework of precision oncology, it is critical to comprehensively characterize the clinical and molecular profiles of MTAP-deleted tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This pan-cancer retrospective cohort study analyzed clinico-genomic data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database, which includes 99.7% of patients who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in Japan between June 2019 and November 2023. Machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence methods were applied to identify clinical predictors of MTAP deficiency. Findings were validated and compared using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) datasets. RESULTS: Among 51 828 pan-cancer patients in the C-CAT cohort, MTAP deletion was observed in 4964 cases (9.6%), with a high prevalence in pancreatic (18.4%), biliary tract (15.6%), and lung (14.3%) cancers. MTAP deletion was associated with distinct clinical features, including male sex (56.0% versus 47.8%), older age (mean 62.4 versus 59.8 years), and shorter interval from diagnosis to CGP (median 380.0 versus 567.0 days). In pancreatic cancer, MTAP deletion was more common in KRAS-mutant tumors (19.8%) compared with KRAS wild-type tumors (8.9%). Across cancer types, MTAP deletion was less frequent in RB1-mutant tumors (pan-cancer: 3.2%, pancreatic: 7.6%, lung: 2.5%, biliary tract: 5.4%) than in RB1 wild-type tumors (9.9%, 18.7%, 16.1%, 16.0%). These findings were validated using the TCGA (n = 9896) and GENIE (n = 178 034) datasets. In lung adenocarcinoma, MTAP deletion was found in 22.8% of EGFR-mutated tumors, 25.0% of ALK-translocated tumors, and 20.8% of ROS1-translocated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: MTAP deletion is associated with unique clinical and molecular features. These findings define the characteristics of MTAP-deleted cancers and provide a basis for synthetic lethal strategies in precision oncology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it