High-throughput protein target mapping enables accelerated bioactivity discovery for ToxCast and PFAS compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chemical pollution is a global threat to human health, yet the toxicity mechanism of most contaminants remains unknown. Here, we applied an ultrahigh-throughput affinity-selection mass spectrometry (AS-MS) platform to systematically identify protein targets of prioritized chemical contaminants. After benchmarking the platform, we screened 50 human proteins against 481 prioritized chemicals, including 446 ToxCast chemicals and 35 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Among 24,050 interactions assessed, we discovered 35 novel interactions involving 14 proteins, with fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) emerging as the most ligandable protein family. Given this, we selected FABPs for further validation, which revealed a distinct PFAS binding pattern: legacy PFAS selectively bound to FABP1, whereas replacement compounds, PFECAs, unexpectedly interacted with all FABPs. X-ray crystallography further revealed that the ether group enhances molecular flexibility of alternative PFAS, to accommodate the binding pockets of FABPs. Our findings demonstrate that AS-MS is a robust platform for the discovery of novel protein targets beyond the scope of the ToxCast program and highlight the broader protein-binding spectrum of alternative PFAS as potential regrettable substitutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".