MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408878608 · doi:10.58837/chula.the.2002.1978

The 30-Baht Scheme : utilization of the gold card and the patient satisfaction at the Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok

2002· dissertation· en· W4408878608 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sonam Rinchen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDescriptive statisticsQuarter (Canadian coin)Test (biology)Sample (material)Chi-square testMedicineGold standard (test)Family medicinePsychologyGeographyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried from 3rd-28th February 2003 at Chulalongkorn Memorial Howpital. The objectives of the study were to examine utilization of the Gold Card among the 30-Baht patients, to describe the attitude towards the 30-Baht Scheme and to determine satisfaction with hospital services under this scheme. The study was hospital based with a sample of 213 subjects were purposively determined as subjects. Two comparative groups (both 30-baht patients) were considered - registered and self-referred groups. Trained interviewers used pre-tested questionnaires to collect data, which included demographic features, attitude, utilization and satisfaction variables. Descriptive statistics as well as Non-arametric test, chi-Square test and correlation were used to explain relationships and significant difference between the variables of interest in the two groups. Women respondents represented 72.7% of the sample. A quarter of respondents is aged above 60 years. Generally, education level is low (51% primary grade) and unemployment is hight (32%). The literacy rate is low in the self-referred group, and 43% do not earn income at all, yet they can afford to pay for the services at Chulalongkorn Hospital. The self-referred group prefers this Hospital because of skilled doctors and trust and confidence in care. Nearly 85% of them are willing to register at this Hospital if given an opportunity. 52% of respondents used the Gold Card only in 2002, while 26% never used so far. Very few (15%) have used more than 6 times. The attitude of the respondents towards the 30-baht scheme was moderate (2.58), while both groups did not seem to agree with continuity of the scheme, though they felt privileged of using the Gold card. There was a significant difference in attitudes between the groups (p<.001). Satisfaction level was found high among the respondents (80.37%). Satisfaction in the care provided by doctors was accorded the highest rating in both the groups (>90%). And there was no significant difference in the satisfaction level between the registered and self-referred groups (p<.05), though there is difference in attitudes. Satisfaction had weak positive relation with attitude. A significant differnce was determied between the gold card utilization and payment methods (p<.001). Services of Chulalongkorn Hospital are regarded as highly satisfied by the 30-baht patients. In general, there seemed to be low utilization of the Gold Card among the registered group. Despite moderate attitudes towards the 30-Baht scheme, no variables seemed to deter the satisfction level of all respondents. However, respondent were not happy with the waiting time. Nonetheless, high satisfaction level among the users reflects the efficiency and high quality care at the Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPatient Satisfaction in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207