MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Risk factors associated with severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome in singleton and twin pregnancies: a population-based cohort study

2025· preprint· en· W4408880665 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mackenzie Campbell, Johanna Koegl, Jeffrey N. Bone, Sofia Nicolls, Janet Lyons, Chantal Mayer, Kenneth Lim, Julianne van Schalkwyk, K.S. Joseph, Sarka Lisonkova

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingletonHELLP syndromePreeclampsiaMedicineObstetricsMaternal morbidityPopulationCohortPregnancyCohort studyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To compare pre-pregnancy risk factors associated with severe preeclampsia/eclampsia (SPE) and/or HELLP syndrome among singleton versus twin pregnancies. Design: A population-based retrospective cohort study. Setting: British Columbia (BC), Canada. Population: All pregnancies with singletons or twins that resulted in a stillbirth or live birth at ≥20 weeks’ gestation from 2008/09 to 2020/21. Methods: Data were obtained from the BC Perinatal Database Registry. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between each risk factor (e.g., body-mass-index (BMI), in-vitro-fertilization (IVF), chronic hypertension, and diabetes) and SPE/HELLP, as well as the modifying effect of plurality. Main Outcome Measures: Severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, and/or HELLP syndrome. Results: Among 563,252 pregnancies (8,841 twin, 554,411 singleton), the rate of SPE/HELLP was 4.7 per 1,000 singleton pregnancies and 31.1 per 1,000 twin pregnancies (relative risk 6.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.84-7.49). Older maternal age (≥35 years), nulliparity, pre-pregnancy and gestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, prior mental health problems, substance use during pregnancy and prior stillbirth increased the odds, while smoking decreased the odds of SPE/HELLP among both singletons and twins. However, the adjusted associations between BMI, IVF, prior abortions and SPE/HELLP differed by plurality: IVF and high BMI were associated with elevated risks in singleton pregnancies but not in twins, while a history of prior abortions was associated with decreased risk in twin but not singleton pregnancies. Conclusions: High BMI and IVF are associated with elevated risk of SPE/HELLP syndrome in singleton pregnancies, but not in twin pregnancies. This study provides insights regarding SPE/HELLP syndrome among singleton and twin pregnancies, and useful information for pre-pregnancy counselling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→