Imputing missing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> strains with a Denoising AutoEncoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a problematic pathogen with complex antibiotic resistance patterns. In clinical practice, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) tests typically focus on a limited subset of antibiotics, hindering a comprehensive assessment of a strain’s resistance profile. Here, we introduce MICFiller, a Denoising AutoEncoder (DAE) model designed to impute missing MIC values for 14 antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa within a specific dilution range by leveraging known MIC measurements for other antibiotics in the same strain. We evaluated the performance of DAE against two other commonly used methods: Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) and simple median imputation. The DAE achieved the highest balanced 1-tier accuracy for most antibiotics, with performance closely matching that of MICE. MICFiller is freely accessible through a user-friendly web interface at http://iorgalab.org:4567/micfiller , offering clinicians a more complete view of a strain’s antibiotic resistance profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".