MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408882926 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20249155

Assessment of the validity of on-farm tests to diagnose uterine infection in dairy cows

2025· article· en· W4408882926 on OpenAlexaff
J. Denis-Robichaud, Nicolas Barbeau-Grégoire, Marie-Lou Gauthier, Simon Dufour, J.P. Roy, Sébastien Buczinski, J. Dubuc

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationService de Recherche et d'EXpertise en Transformation des Produits Forestiers
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDairy cattleAnimal scienceObstetricsBiologyMedicineVeterinary medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dairy cows commonly experience uterine bacterial infections post-calving, which can lead to reproductive tract inflamma­tion. While diagnosing uterine infection requires bacteriologi­cal culture, on-farm identification of inflammation is quicker. Moreover, antimicrobial treatment has shown positive impacts on reproductive performance of cows identified with inflam­mation of the reproductive tract. In the face of antimicrobial resistance concerns, however, the diagnostic of uterine infec­tion might become essential. In this prospective cross-sectional study, our aim was to assess the diagnostic validity of various tests for identifying uterine infection (UI) in dairy cows, and to evaluate their utility under different scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207