MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408882980 · doi:10.1016/j.xfss.2025.03.004

The role of ethnicity and polycystic ovary syndrome on pregnancy complications: an analysis of a population database

2025· article· en· W4408882980 on OpenAlexaff
Magdalena Peeva, Ahmad Badeghiesh, Haitham Baghlaf, Michael H. Dahan

Bibliographic record

VenueF&S Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolycystic ovaryPregnancyEthnic groupMedicinePopulationObstetricsOvaryGynecologyDatabaseInternal medicineBiologyComputer scienceGeneticsAnthropologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine the independent effect of ethnicity on obstetric outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). DESIGN: This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2014. Women with PCOS were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared across ethnic groups. The chi-square tests assessed baseline characteristics, and logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between ethnicity and outcomes, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). SUBJECTS: A total of 12,782 pregnant women with PCOS were identified between 2004 and 2014, categorized by ethnicity: White (n = 9,107); African American (n = 1,098); Hispanic (n = 1,288); and Asian (n = 741). EXPOSURE: The exposure of interest was maternal ethnicity and its association with pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes among women with PCOS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal complications were assessed across ethnic groups. RESULTS: Asian women had a higher odds of having gestational diabetes (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.96; 95% CI, 1.49-2.58), chorioamnionitis (aOR, 3.41; 95% CI, 2.12-5.47), operative vaginal delivery (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.65-3.56), postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (aOR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.25-3.43), and maternal infection (aOR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.80-4.49). African Americans had a higher risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.80), preeclampsia (aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.45), preterm premature rupture of membrane (aOR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.58-4.78), chorioamnionitis (aOR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.12-2.98), and cesarean sections (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.32-2.15) and lower risk of operative vaginal delivery (aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.93), spontaneous vaginal delivery (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.85), and maternal infection (aOR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.21-3.00). The risk of gestational diabetes (aOR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.73) and PPH (aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.47) increased among Hispanic patients. Caucasian patients were at lower risk of gestational diabetes (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.79), chorioamnionitis (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.55), cesarean section (aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95), PPH (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98), blood transfusion (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29-0.83), maternal infection (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.27-0.51), and small-for-gestational-age infants (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93) and had higher odds of having a spontaneous vaginal delivery (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.10-1.43). CONCLUSION: Among women with PCOS, African Americans have the highest number of increased pregnancy complications, followed by Asians and Hispanics. Caucasians with PCOS have the lowest risk of pregnancy complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueF&S ScienceSame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207