MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408884560 · doi:10.1097/asw.0000000000000243

Cutaneous Psoriasis: Clinical Aspects and Treatments

2025· review· en· W4408884560 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan S.Q. Geng, R. Gary Sibbald

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Skin & Wound Care · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsoriasisDermatologyNurse practitionersContinuing educationWound careDiseasePhysician assistantsSkin careMEDLINEIntensive care medicineNursingHealth careInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Cutaneous psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition, with lesions often appearing as scaly plaques with erythematous bases that can occur anywhere on the body, most commonly on extensor surfaces of the knees and elbows. In the scalp, the plaques often extend beyond the scalp margins. This review focuses on the clinical presentation of cutaneous psoriasis subtypes and treatment options. Other related topics include epidemiology, pathogenesis, and differential diagnoses. GENERAL PURPOSE To present the clinical manifestations of cutaneous psoriasis and apply evidence-supported pharmacologic and treatment strategies to promote disease remission and symptom relief. TARGET AUDIENCE This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES After participating in this educational activity, the participant will: 1. Recognize the clinical manifestations of cutaneous psoriasis. 2. Explain diagnostic approaches to assess for cutaneous psoriasis. 3. Identify evidence-based management pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options for the treatment of cutaneous psoriasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Skin & Wound CareSame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207