The Relationship Between Fluid Control and Health Literacy in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Failure to adhere to fluid restrictions negatively affects the quality of life and increases the risk of complications among hemodialysis patients. In chronic diseases, including chronic kidney disease, health literacy plays a crucial role in mitigating disease complications. The level of health literacy in chronic diseases such as chronic kidney disease can play a significant role in reducing the complications of the disease. This study aimed to assess the relationship between fluid control and health literacy in hemodialysis patients, representing the first such research in Turkey. Methods This descriptive, cross‐sectional, and correlational study was conducted in all dialysis centers in Bolu province, Turkey, from September 2022 to August 2023. The study included 144 hemodialysis outpatients meeting the inclusion criteria. Patient fluid control and health literacy were assessed using the “Fluid Restriction Scale in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment” and the “Turkey Health Literacy Scale‐32”. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0. Results The mean total score on the Health Literacy Scale was 22.6 ± 10.2, indicating a relatively low level of health literacy among the hemodialysis patients. 54.2% of patients receiving hemodialysis treatment exhibited inadequate health literacy. The mean score on the Fluid Restriction Scale was 50.4 ± 8.63, suggesting moderate fluid control adherence among the study population. 56.3% of hemodialysis patients had moderate levels of fluid control. A statistically significant moderate positive correlation was found between fluid control and health literacy levels ( r = 0.456, p < 0.001). Health literacy scores accounted for 20.2% of the variance in fluid restriction scores ( R 2 = 0.20), indicating a moderate contribution of health literacy to fluid control adherence. Conclusion This study revealed a positive correlation between health literacy and fluid control adherence. Therefore, it is recommended that hemodialysis nurses concurrently assess patients' health literacy and fluid control and develop tailored educational programs based on these assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".