MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408890569 · doi:10.59188/eduvest.v5i3.50269

Profile of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients at Rumah Sakit Universitas Indonesia Depok Period October 2024

2025· article· en· W4408890569 on OpenAlexaff
Suci Rizki Dumiarsih, Santi Purna Sari, Retnosari Andrajati, Diah Handayani

Bibliographic record

VenueEduvest - Journal Of Universal Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDiverse Scientific Research Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTuberculosisMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indonesia has been one of the three countries in Asia that contributes to the highest case of Tuberculosis (TB) in the world. Tuberculosis itself counted as the top ten cause of death globally. Two of the challenges in controlling TB cases are the occurrence of drug-resistance strain and patients’ adherence. Drug-resistant TB has to be treated with the second line drugs of TB with higher risk of adverse events. Linezolid as one of the suggested drugs by WHO in the treatment may increase patients’ risk of cytopenia events. This study was conducted to represent the profile of drug-resistant TB obtained from Rumah Sakit Universitas Indonesia (RSUI) Depok period October 2024. Design of this study is a quantitative-descriptive where the data of patients obtained from the patients’ medical records in the period of October 2024. The findings of this study showed the total number of drug-resistant TB was 104 with 3 cases of HIV and 70 patients having Linezolid in their regimen. Most of the patients are male with mean of age 41.3 years. New cases and RR/MDR TB level are dominated while on the other hand there’s 9 cases of After Failure and 4 others are After Loss to Follow-up. Median values obtained for patients’ leukocytes, hemoglobin, and platelets are 7818.0, 11.9, 279.5 respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEduvest - Journal Of Universal StudiesSame topicDiverse Scientific Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207