MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408890693 · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2025.03.013

Liposomal irinotecan for previously treated patients with biliary tract cancer: A pooled analysis of NIFTY and NALIRICC trials

2025· article· en· W4408890693 on OpenAlexaff
Changhoon Yoo, Anna Saborowski, Jaewon Hyung, Patrick Wenzel, Il Hwan Kim, Henning Wege, Kyu‐pyo Kim, Gunnar Folprecht, Baek‐Yeol Ryoo, Phillip Schütt, Jaekyung Cheon, Thorsten Oliver Goetze, Hyewon Ryu, Ji Sung Lee, Arndt Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hepatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersDeutsche KrebshilfeDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology
KeywordsIrinotecanMedicineBiliary tract cancerInternal medicineOncologyBiliary tractPooled analysisGastroenterologyCancerGemcitabineColorectal cancerMeta-analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) combined with fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) as a second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer (BTC) following progression on gemcitabine-based therapy yielded conflicting outcomes in the Korean NIFTY and German NALIRICC trials. This necessitated a comprehensive pooled analysis to evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: Individual patient data were pooled from the intention-to-treat populations of the NIFTY and NALIRICC trials. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 278 patients were included: 137 in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 141 in the 5-FU/LV group. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group showed significantly longer median PFS (3.6 months [95% CI 2.7-4.4] vs. 1.8 months [95% CI 1.5-2.6]; hazard ratio 0.65, p <0.001). Median overall survival was 8.1 months (95% CI 6.0-8.9) and 6.1 months (95% CI 5.3-7.5), respectively (hazard ratio 0.77, p = 0.051). Objective response rates were also higher in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group than in the 5-FU/LV group (17.5% vs. 2.8%; p <0.001). Post-study irinotecan-containing therapy was administered in 4 (2.9%) and 21 (15.3%) patients in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 5-FU/LV group, respectively. Adverse events varied by ethnicity, with gastrointestinal toxicities more common in Germans and neutropenia more prevalent in Koreans; treatment discontinuation without disease progression occurred in 31.3% vs. 8.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The addition of nal-IRI to 5-FU/LV significantly improved PFS and objective response rates, supporting its potential as subsequent-line therapy. Differences in safety profiles underscore the relevance of ethnicity for nal-IRI in patients with BTC. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Current standard of care for second-line therapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is FOLFOX. This study provides robust evidence supporting the potential role of adding liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) to fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as a subsequent therapy for patients with BTC who have progressed on gemcitabine-based regimens. The findings demonstrate significant improvements in progression-free survival and objective response rates in a patient population for whom treatment options are limited. Furthermore, the study underscores the necessity of considering ethnic differences in adverse event profiles to optimize treatment administration and patient outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03524508 and NCT03043547.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HepatologySame topicCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207