Treatment of severe bleeds with eptacog beta in hemophilia A or B with inhibitors: a post hoc analysis of the PERSEPT 1 and 2 trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Severe bleeding episodes (BEs) in persons with hemophilia A or B and inhibitors (PwHABIs) represent challenging clinical situations and can require treatment regimens lasting days or weeks before hemostatic control is achieved. Eptacog beta is a recombinant activated human factor VII bypassing agent approved for treating and controlling bleeding in PwHABIs aged ≥12 years. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of eptacog beta for severe bleed treatment in PwHABIs during 2 phase 3 trials (PERSEPT 1 and PERSEPT 2). Patients could treat severe BEs with initial doses of 75 or 225 μg/kg eptacog beta at home, followed by subsequent 75 μg/kg eptacog beta infusions administered at predefined intervals in a hospital or hemophilia treatment center. Satisfactory treatment responses to eptacog beta were typically defined in this post hoc analysis by physician- and patient-reported hemostasis evaluations of "excellent" or "good." Hemostatic control of an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in 1 patient was assessed by computed tomography. Seven PwHABIs (aged 1-50 years) treated 8 BEs considered severe or otherwise life threatening with eptacog beta during PERSEPT 1 and PERSEPT 2. Hemostatic control of 7 of these BEs (including 3 ICH events) was achieved. Eptacog beta treatment durations ranged from 25 minutes to 96 hours. No thrombotic events were reported, and eptacog beta was well tolerated. Most severe BEs resolved with eptacog beta treatment during PERSEPT 1 and PERSEPT 2. The PERSEPT 1 and PERSEPT 2 trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02020369 and #NCT02448680, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".