Efficacy of a Web-Based Integrated Growth Mindset Intervention on Reducing Anxiety Among Social Work and Counseling Practicum Trainees: Protocol for a 2-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Practicum is indispensable for the development of professional practitioners; yet, trainees may encounter psychological distress, especially anxiety, brought on by new challenges. Research stated that a positive mindset promotes better learning and mental status. Well-designed interventions have been shown to relieve anxiety and help trainees thrive in their practicums and professions. The proposed study adapted an integrated intervention, We-SMILE (Web-Based Single-Session Intervention of Mindset on Intelligence, Failure, and Emotion), for improving prepracticum anxiety and coping. We-SMILE has the potential to be a low-intensity self-help prepracticum intervention to support students in adjusting their mindsets and overcoming the challenges in practicum. OBJECTIVE: Using a 2-arm randomized controlled trial, this study aims to examine the efficacy of We-SMILE on reducing anxiety (primary outcome) and enhancing psychological status, psychological well-being, learning orientation, academic self-efficacy, and confidence (secondary outcomes). METHODS: A total of 117 students will be recruited from the social work and counseling programs and randomly assigned to existing prepracticum training (training as usual [TAU]) or that plus the We-SMILE. Participants will be assessed repeatedly at 3 time points: baseline, 2 weeks post intervention, and 8 weeks post intervention. The outcomes will be measured by validated items and scales on anxiety, mindsets, psychological well-being, and the Failure Mindset Scale. Recruitment for the pilot study was initiated in May 2024 during social work and counseling prepracticum briefing sessions. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or TAU group. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis principle and linear regression-based maximum likelihood multilevel models will be used for data analysis. RESULTS: This study has received research ethics approval in May 2024. Participant recruitment started at the end of May 2024, and enrollment was ongoing as of when this protocol was submitted. Data collection and analyses are expected to be complete in 2025. CONCLUSIONS: The randomized controlled trial will compare the efficacy of the We-SMILE intervention group and the TAU group. The results of this study will benefit practicum students, fieldwork supervisors, and social work and counseling programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06509802; https://tinyurl.com/36vkwd63. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/67234.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".