MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408910843 · doi:10.36548/jiip.2025.1.003

A YOLOv8-based AI System for Real-Time Endemic Species Threat Detection and Response

2025· article· en· W4408910843 on OpenAlexaff
Nalayini C.M., V. Kalpana, S. Hemamalini, K. Sathyamoorthy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Innovative Image Processing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endemic species are under threat from various factors, including habitat destruction, illegal hunting, and climate change, which necessitate urgent and effective monitoring solutions. This research introduces an advanced AI system for real-time threat detection and response, utilizing the YOLOv8 algorithm. The system is specifically developed for the protection of endemic species. It combines the strengths of YOLOv8 with enhancements like a multi-scale detection module to tackle the challenges of identifying small or camouflaged species and threats across different ecological environments. In the proposed study, a customized dataset that is developed through the application of the Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) technique along with the Firefly Algorithm is employed. This approach facilitates the efficient fine-tuning of all images within the dataset, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the analysis. The Roboflow platform is used for training, validation, and testing the customized dataset for real-time object detection. YOLOv8 achieves 97.9% mAP, 94.7% precision, and 91.9% recall. Threats are recorded in a Blockchain ledger and sent to Twilio SMS alert system, making it cost-effective and efficient. The proposed framework offers high accuracy, precision, and recall, minimizing false alarms and facilitating quick interventions, making it suitable for smart environmental management systems and biodiversity conservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Innovative Image ProcessingSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207