Multi-Year Registry Study of Elapegademase Treatment in Patients With Adenosine Deaminase Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (ADA-SCID) Requiring Enzyme Replacement Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose The safety and tolerability of elapegademase (elapegademase-lvlr; Revcovi ® ) a PEGylated recombinant adenosine deaminase (ADA), were demonstrated in two Phase 3 clinical trials in the U.S. and Japan in patients with ADA-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency (ADA-SCID). Elapegademase replaced Adagen ® (pegademase, a PEGylated bovine ADA) in 2018. This registry study (NCT03878069) was conducted as a post-marketing requirement to bolster the limited safety and effectiveness data on elapegademase in patients with ADA-SCID and to study patients starting on enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) de novo . Methods Patients were managed by routine clinical care and treating physicians’ judgement from September 2019 to January 2023. Primary endpoints included trough plasma ADA activity and total trough erythrocyte deoxyadenosine nucleotides (dAXP). Secondary outcomes included lymphocyte counts, hospitalizations, infections, and safety outcomes. Results Thirty-two patients were grouped as ERT-naïve ( n = 7; infants and children with no prior ERT [EN]); pegademase-transitioning ( n = 21; from pegademase to elapegademase [PT]); and patients who had participated in the Phase 3 clinical trial ( n = 4; STP-2279-002; [STP]). The EN group maintained optimal plasma ADA activity, increased lymphocyte counts, had manageable infections, and had no mortality for up to 30 months while on elapegademase. The STP group and 66.7% of the PT group continued to maintain satisfactory levels of both ADA and dAXP with stable rates of infections and hospitalizations and stable lymphocyte counts for up to 48.6 months. Variability on all measures was seen, but overall, patients did not deteriorate while on elapegademase. Conclusion Effectiveness of elapegademase was maintained up to 4 years of use and with no new safety concerns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".