MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408926129 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.150205

IoT-Based Real-Time Carbon Monoxide Mitigation for MSME Indoor Environments

2025· article· en· W4408926129 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fivia Eliza, Oriza Candra, Riki Mukhaiyar, Radinal Fadli, Abdulnassir Yassin, Valiant Lukad Perdana Sutrisno, Mustofa Abi Hamid, Mohammad Raafi Jauhari

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon monoxideEnvironmental scienceCO poisoningInternet of ThingsComputer scienceComputer securityChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to develop an IoT-based real-time carbon monoxide mitigation system for monitoring and controlling CO levels in MSME indoor environments.The methods used in this study include problem analysis, and product design, followed by three stages of experiments in which the CO concentration is systematically increased from 50 ppm to above 200 ppm for system response testing.The subjects of this study were MSMEs that use fossil fuel equipment in their daily operations.The results show that the system effectively detects increased CO levels and responds appropriately.At a CO concentration of 58 PPM, Fan 1 is activated, while at a CO concentration of 105 PPM, Fan 1 and Fan 2 are activated with low-intensity buzzer alarms.When the CO concentration exceeds 200 PPM, the system triggers maximum safety action, activating both fans, a high-intensity buzzer, and a red emergency light.In addition, real-time notifications are sent to mobile devices, ensuring alertness and rapid response.The findings of this study indicate that the use of IoT technology in managing workplace safety can significantly increase the speed and effectiveness of responses to CO gas threats, potentially reducing the risks faced by workers in MSME workplaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207