Oxygen Depletion and the Role of Cellular Antioxidants in FLASH Radiotherapy: Mechanistic Insights from Monte Carlo Radiation-Chemical Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy is a novel irradiation modality that employs ultra-high mean dose rates exceeding 40–150 Gy/s, far surpassing the typical ~0.03 Gy/s used in conventional radiotherapy. This advanced technology delivers high doses of radiation within milliseconds, effectively targeting tumors while minimizing damage to the surrounding healthy tissues. However, the precise mechanism that differentiates responses between tumor and normal tissues is not yet understood. This study primarily examines the ROD hypothesis, which posits that oxygen undergoes transient radiolytic depletion following a radiation pulse. We developed a computational model to investigate the effects of dose rate on radiolysis in an aqueous environment that mimics a confined cellular space subjected to instantaneous pulses of energetic protons. This study employed the multi-track chemistry Monte Carlo simulation code, IONLYS-IRT, which has been optimized to model this radiolysis in a homogeneous and aerated medium. This medium is composed primarily of water, alongside carbon-based biological molecules (RH), radiation-induced bio-radicals (R●), glutathione (GSH), ascorbate (AH−), nitric oxide (●NO), and α-tocopherol (TOH). Our model closely monitors the temporal variations in these components, specifically focusing on oxygen consumption, from the initial picoseconds to one second after exposure. Simulations reveal that cellular oxygen is transiently depleted primarily through its reaction with R● radicals, consistent with prior research, but also with glutathione disulfide radical anions (GSSG●−) in roughly equal proportions. Notably, we show that, contrary to some reports, the peroxyl radicals (ROO●) formed are not neutralized by recombination reactions. Instead, these radicals are rapidly neutralized by antioxidants present in irradiated cells, with AH− and ●NO proving to be the most effective in preventing the propagation of harmful peroxidation chain reactions. Moreover, our model identifies a critical dose rate threshold below which the FLASH effect, as predicted by the ROD hypothesis, cannot fully manifest. By comparing our findings with existing experimental data, we determine that the ROD hypothesis alone cannot entirely explain the observed FLASH effect. Our findings indicate that antioxidants might significantly contribute to the FLASH effect by mitigating radiation-induced cellular damage and, in turn, enhancing cellular radioprotection. Additionally, our model lends support to the hypothesis that transient oxygen depletion may partially contribute to the FLASH effect observed in radiotherapy. However, our findings indicate that this mechanism alone is insufficient to fully explain the phenomenon, suggesting the involvement of additional mechanisms or factors and warranting further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".