MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408939157 · doi:10.36950/2025.2ciss077

The effect of single and dual task training on the intracortical inhibition in young and old adults

2025· article· en· W4408939157 on OpenAlex
Michael Wälchli, Craig D. Tokuno, Benedikt Lauber, Wolfgang Taube

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Issues in Sport Science (CISS) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Health Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)Task (project management)PsychologyNeurosciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationCognitive psychologyMedicineArtEngineeringLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction It has been demonstrated that single-task (ST) balance training enhances performance in balancing alone, whereas dual-task (DT) balance training improves the ability to perform two tasks concurrently (Kiss et al., 2018). Previous research has also indicated that short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is modulated in a task-specific manner following explosive or balance training (Taube et al., 2020). Based on these findings, the objective of this study was to investigate task-specific modulations of intracortical inhibition following ST or DT training in both young and older adults. Methods Participants were randomly separated into 2 different training groups (ST or DT) among their age (young or old). Young groups had 6 and old groups 9 balance training sessions within 3 weeks, the DT training consisted of cognitive and motor secondary tasks. Pre and post training, a balance task was performed on a rocker board in three different conditions: 1) balance only 2) balance + secondary motor (ball on a tray) and 3) balance + secondary cognitive (2-back). During the execution of these three conditions, SICI was measured with TMS by applying single pulse (120 % aMT) and double pulse stimulations (70 % + 120 % aMT) over the motor cortical area representing the right tibialis anterior muscle. Results Training improvements in balance performance trended to be condition-specific (p = .057). While the ST training groups only improved in the single balance task (5.2%), the DT training groups reduced the balance sway in all 3 conditions, but mostly in the dual motor condition (19.1%). Furthermore, there was a trend towards a time*age effect (p = .065), indicating improvements only in young participants (12.6% vs -0.1% in old).There was a significant fourfold interaction for SICI (p = .048), mainly indicating A) an upregulation in young (34.1%) and a downregulation in old (-33.9%) after the training and B) increased SICI after DT training in the dual motor condition (50.2%) and after ST training in single balance (21.7%). Discussion/Conclusion This study provides further evidence for task-specific adaptations after balance training, as ST training was beneficial for balancing alone and DT training in the dual motor task. This result is supported by the modulation of SICI. The changes were age-specific, with no improvements for the older groups. More interestingly, intracortical inhibition was upregulated in young and downregulated in old, indicating age-specific adaptations in SICI following a comparable training protocol. Based on the hypothesis that intracortical inhibition decreases during initial motor learning and increases in later stages, we hypothesize that a training duration of 3 weeks is sufficient to induce positive cortical modulation in young adults but not in older adults. References Kiss, R., Brueckner, D., & Muehlbauer, T. (2018). Effects of single compared to dual task practice on learning a dynamic balance task in young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00311 Taube, W., Gollhofer, A., & Lauber, B. (2020). Training‐, muscle‐ and task‐specific up‐ and downregulation of cortical inhibitory processes. European Journal of Neuroscience, 51(6), 1428–1440. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14538

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it