MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408939634 · doi:10.1016/j.aac.2025.03.006

Aflatoxin B1 contamination level detection in almond kernels through short wave infrared hyperspectral image analysis

2025· article· en· W4408939634 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Ahasan Kabir, Ivan Lee, C. B. Singh, Gayatri Mishra, Brajesh Kumar Panda, Sang‐Heon Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Agrochem · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsLethbridge College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingAflatoxinContaminationInfraredEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingEnvironmental chemistryChemistryBiologyFood scienceOpticsGeologyPhysicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a toxic fungal metabolite that contaminates almonds from cultivation to harvesting. It leads to chronic health problems and significant economic loss to the producers. Therefore, a fast and non-invasive detection technique is crucial for safeguarding food safety by swiftly identifying and eliminating contaminated almonds from the supply chain. Hyperspectral imaging has been explored as a potential non-destructive technology for detecting AFB1. However, the diverse geometries of almonds present a significant challenge on acquired images, thereby impacting the accuracy of the developed prediction and classification models. This study investigates the effectiveness of short-wave infrared (SWIR) hyperspectral imaging combined with deep learning for detecting AFB1 in almonds of varying geometries. Initially, partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were evaluated for quantification, while SVM and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) classifiers were applied for classification. The results indicated that spectral responses varied with almond thickness, making quantification models unreliable for industrial applications. The Competitive Adaptive Reweighted Sampling (CARS) algorithm was employed to identify key spectral features for developing multi-spectral AFB1 classification models to evaluate the feasibility of high-speed, accurate in-line detection. The deep learning approach significantly outperformed traditional machine learning models, with the pre-trained Inception V3 network achieving a cross-validation accuracy of 84.82 %, an F1-score of 0.8522, and an area under curve of 0.893. These findings highlight the superiority of deep learning-based hyperspectral imaging for accurate and reliable AFB1 detection in almonds with diverse shapes and thicknesses . • Almonds Are susceptible to aflatoxin B1 in warm and humidity temperatures. • Uses SWIR hyperspectral imaging for non-destructive aflatoxin B1 detection. • Almond thickness variation impacts the hyperspectral image response. • Aflatoxin B1 classification effective on thickness varies almonds. • Binary classification as more feasible for inline aflatoxin B1 detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced AgrochemSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207