MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408946634 · doi:10.62347/mdoh5036

Efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures

2025· article· en· W4408946634 on OpenAlex
Yinghong Ma

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Translational Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth Commission of Guizhou Province
KeywordsMedicineOsteoporosisBlock (permutation group theory)Internal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures (OVCF). METHODS: A total of 120 OVCF patients, admitted between March 2022 and September 2022, were enrolled and assigned to either a control group or a research group (n=60 each) in this retrospective study. The control group received conventional analgesic treatment, while the research group was treated with ESPB. Data were collected at three time points: before surgery (T0), after four treatment sessions (T1), and prior to discharge (T2). Pain intensity was assessed using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), which includes the Pain Rating Index (PRI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Present Pain Intensity (PPI). Inflammatory markers such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured. Additional parameters included the number of intramuscular tramadol injections from days 4 to 7, sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), quality of life via the 16-item Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Osteoporosis (ECOS-16), and treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: The research group exhibited significant reductions in PRI, VAS, and PPI at T0, T1, and T2 compared to the control group (all P<0.05). At T1 and T2, pain scores in the research group were notably lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Two weeks post-treatment, levels of TNF-α, HMGB-1, and hs-CRP were significantly lower in the research group than in the control group and pre-treatment values (all P<0.05). Conversely, the ECOS-16 score was significantly higher in the research group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the research group required fewer intramuscular tramadol injections (days 4-7) and reported higher treatment satisfaction (both, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ESPB for OVCF patients demonstrated significant analgesic benefits, reducing pain, serum inflammatory markers, tramadol injections during days 4-7, and improving sleep quality, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it