MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408956308 · doi:10.1111/cge.14743

Case Report: Gingival Hyperplasia and Scoliosis as Additional Features of <i>EMC10</i> ‐Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder

2025· article· en· W4408956308 on OpenAlexaff
Gaëlle Forest‐St‐Onge, Jean‐François Soucy, Marie‐Ange Delrue, Philippe M. Campeau

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrocephalyIntellectual disabilityNeurodevelopmental disorderAutism spectrum disorderScoliosisExome sequencingGlobal developmental delayMedicineEpilepsyPediatricsMutationAutismGeneticsPhenotypeBiologyPsychiatryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The EMC10-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder (also known as NEDDFAS for Neurodevelopmental Disorder with Dysmorphic Facies and variable Seizures) is an autosomal recessive syndrome characterized by global developmental delay, intellectual disability, microcephaly, seizures, renal abnormalities, and minor facial dysmorphic features. We report an individual with developmental delay and intellectual disability, harboring a homozygous pathogenic mutation in EMC10 (NM_206538.4, c.343C>T, p.(Arg115Ter)), identified through exome reanalysis. Notably, this patient presents gingival hyperplasia and scoliosis, features previously associated with EMC1 mutations, but not with EMC10 mutations. Here, we not only broaden the phenotypic spectrum of EMC10-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder, but also underscore the importance of exome reanalysis in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical GeneticsSame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207