Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of MK-6194, an IL-2 mutein designed to selectively activate regulatory T cells: single ascending dose and multiple ascending dose trial data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MK-6194, an interleukin-2 mutein designed to selectively activate regulatory T cells (Tregs), was evaluated for safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics in healthy participants. In a single ascending dose trial (N = 56), participants received subcutaneous MK-6194 or placebo (3:1 ratio) across dose levels ranging from 1 to 10 mg. In a multiple ascending dose trial (N = 54), participants received subcutaneous MK-6194 or placebo (3:1 ratio) at dose levels ranging from 0.5 to 5 mg every 2 wk (total 3 doses) as well as 5 mg every 4 wk (total 2 doses). Baseline characteristics were comparable between trials, with participants mostly male with a mean age of 36 yr. There were no serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. The most common adverse events were injection site erythema and eosinophil count elevations (with no indication of severe eosinophilia or eosinophilia-related organ damage). PK showed dose-proportionality and repeated doses of MK-6194 did not result in accumulation or time-dependent PK. Immunogenicity was low with no impact on PK or safety. Treg expansion as assessed by flow cytometry and Treg-specific demethylation region analysis was observed in a dose-dependent manner during both trials and expanded within about 8 d postdose up to about 5-fold and returned to baseline by 14 to 29 d postdose. Minimal impact was observed on other lymphocytes including total T lymphocyte and natural killer cell counts. These findings support the further development of MK-6194 as a potential treatment for autoimmune disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".