MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408959504 · doi:10.47489/szmc.v39i1.576

Efficacy and Safety of HIFU in Improving Bladder Control in Women with Urinary Incontinence

2025· article· en· W4408959504 on OpenAlexaff
Sampana Fatima, Sana Rauf, Shagufta Awais, Saadia Kanwal, Wajeeha Imam

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrinary incontinenceMedicineUrologyUrinary bladder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Urinary incontinence is a common gynecological issue, affecting millions of women worldwide due to the weakening of pelvic floor muscles. Aims & Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for strengthening pelvic floor muscles and improving bladder control in women with urinary incontinence. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at CMH Multan from April 2023 to May 2024 in collaboration with the gynecology and urology departments. Material & Methods: The current non-randomized trial included 100 females diagnosed with urinary incontinence and aged ?35 years through non-probability convenience sampling. This study adopted a unique HIFU treatment consisting of weekly 20-minute sessions over 8 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was a change in urinary incontinence symptoms measured by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) score. Secondary outcomes included a reduction in incontinence episodes, bladder control parameters (maximum bladder capacity and detrusor pressure), strengthening pelvic floor (perineometry, digital palpation), life quality (I-QOL and PFDI-20), and adverse events. Descriptive statistics were expressed using SPSS version 23.0, as mean ± SD or frequency/percentages to check the mean difference across the two groups, t-test was applied. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The HIFU group showed a significant decrease in ICIQ-UI SF scores (-6 ± 2) compared to the non-HIFU group (-2 ± 1, p < 0.001). HIFU participants experienced a greater decrease in incontinence episodes (10 ± 3 vs. 4 ± 2, p< 0.001) and improvements in bladder control and muscle strength. Participants undergoing HIFU demonstrated a significant rise in the I-QOL score (p < 0.01), with 80% reporting subjective improvement. The HIFU group also experienced minimal adverse effects and the results were significant. P<0.05. Conclusion: HIFU is an effective, safe, and non-invasive treatment for urinary incontinence, significantly improving symptoms, bladder control, muscle strength, and life quality while offering minimum to no adverse effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex LahoreSame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207