MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408962568 · doi:10.1080/17474124.2025.2486304

Identifying and managing rare subtypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

2025· review· en· W4408962568 on OpenAlexaff
Leonidas Mavroeidis, Foteini Kalofonou, Ruth Casey, Andrea Napolitano, Ramesh Bulusu, Robin L. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStromal cellInternal medicinePathologyCancer researchOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction A subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) lack the common mutations in KIT/PDGFRa genes. This is a rare and heterogeneous group of challenging GISTs due to their diversity and absence of sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib.Areas covered In this manscript, we review the pathogenesis, natural history, diagnostic features and management of KIT/PDGFRa wild-type (WT) GISTs, including SDH-deficient GISTs, GISTs with mutations in the RAS/RAF pathway, quadruple WT GISTs which lack mutations in either KIT/PDGFRa and SDH genes or components of the RAS/RAF pathway, syndromic GISTs as well as GISTs with rare KIT/PDGFRa mutations.Expert opinion Patients should be managed in referrence centers. There is progress in the understanding of the biology of these GISTs and promising therapeutic targets have been identified. In SDH-deficient GISTs, the TKI olverembatinib has shown encouraging clinical activity but requires further clinical validation, while the HIF2a inhibitor bezultifan and temozolomide alone or in combination with the death receptor agonist 5 are under clinical investigation. Targeting the RAS/RAF pathway in RAS/RAF-mutated GISTs warrants evaluation in clinical trials. Rare molecular alterations in quadruple WT GISTs require investigation for their oncogenic potential. Collaborative research and patient advocacy is critical for these extremely rare tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Gastroenterology & HepatologySame topicGastrointestinal Tumor Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207