MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4408965154 · doi:10.1093/jhps/hnaf011.091

OP2.6 Periacetabular Osteotomy and Combined Femoral Head-Neck Junction Osteochondroplasty: A Concise Follow-up of a Previous Report at a mean of 10 years

2025· article· en· W4408965154 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kyle P. O’Connor, Frank W. Parilla, Michael D. Harris, Jeffrey J. Nepple, Cecilia Pascual‐Garrido, John C. Clohisy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hip Preservation Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFemoral headSurgeryHead and neckOsteotomyFemoroacetabular impingementHead (geology)OrthodonticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Hip dysplasia is a well-known cause of hip dysfunction and secondary osteoarthritis in the young adult population that is commonly treated by periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Contemporary treatment for hip dysplasia includes PAO with selected concomitant procedures including osteochondroplasty (OCP) for femoral head-neck abnormalities to improve survivorship and clinical outcomes following the PAO. The purpose of this study is to assess the 10-year survivorship and outcomes following PAO with or without OCP. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 38 patients (38 hips) who underwent a PAO with OCP compared to a matched control group of 42 patients (42 hips) who underwent a PAO alone between 2000 and 2007. The modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were utilized for outcome measurements. Failure was defined as clinical failure (failure to meet mHHS MCID or PASS), conversion to THA, reoperations, and composite failure (either clinical failure or reoperation). Results: Mean follow up was 10.6 years for the PAO OCP cohort (range, 6.9 to 16.3 years) and 11.8 years for the PAO-only cohort (range, 7.2-17.2 years). Improvement in PROMs were similar between groups along with MCID, PASS, and rates of clinical failure (p-values >0.05). Rates of reoperation/complications were higher in the PAO only group (33%) compared to the PAO/osteoplasty group (8%) (p=0.005). Four of the reoperations in the PAO only group were from secondary FAI and included OCP and labral repair. Rates of THA conversion slightly missed significance between the groups with 14% in the PAO only and 3% in the PAO/osteo group (p=0.07). Kaplan-Meier (KM) 10-year survivorship estimates from clinical failure were 93.8% and 89.2% for the PAO/osteo and PAO only groups, respectively. The KM 10-year survivorship estimates from reoperation were 97.4% and 72.9%, respectively. Finally, the KM 10-year survivorship estimates from composite failure were 93.8% and 89.7%, respectively. Conclusions: At ten years follow-up, patients undergoing PAO/osteo versus PAO alone, had similar improvements in PROs. However, there was a higher rate of reoperation among patients that underwent PAO alone. Future, long-term follow-up studies should continue to investigate the effect of OCP on outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hip Preservation SurgerySame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207