MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rating of dual-cure composite cements by adhesion strength

2025· article· en· W4408971454 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Ali, Alexander Aleksandrovich Hooves, В. П. Чуев

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Information Aspects of Medicine (Prikladnye informacionnye aspekty mediciny) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposite numberComposite materialMaterials scienceAdhesionDual (grammatical number)Philosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking into account the demand by patients, the issues of improving the aesthetics of a smile with the use of veneers are becoming more and more relevant. The increased service life of veneers is to a certain extent due to the adhesive strength of composite cements. Materials and methods. Double-curing composite cements "Diamondbrite Multi Cure Composite cement", "Panavia F 2.0", "Totalcem", "Variolink Aesthetic DC", "Flowfix DUO", "Compofix", "Compofix + primer" were accepted for the assessment of adhesive strength. These cements were applied to the ends of cylinders made of zirconium oxide stabilized with yttrium oxide "Ext" 3D-PRO. Under the influence of light, the cements polymerized, and the resulting structures were loaded until they collapsed. Results. According to GOST R 56924-2016, sufficient AP was demonstrated by cements Totalcem - 17.391.09 MPa, Panavia F 2.0 - 19.031.44 MPa, Diamondbrite Multi Cure Composite cement - 20.550.78 MPa, and Flowfix DUO - 21.001.20 MPa. Statistical differences in AP in this group are unreliable. Compofix cements 37.102.50 MPa demonstrated high AP (statistical differences in AP between Flowfix DUO and Compofix are significant: (t 5.81; p=0.000021), Variolink 37.702.21 MPa, Compofix+ Primer 41.782.78 MPa. Statistical differences in the AP index in the group of cements with high AP are unreliable. Discussion. It cannot be said that cements with high AP significantly increase the service life of veneers, since violations of the aesthetics of a smile are possible even with a firmly fixed veneer. An example of this can be situations with the formation of discoloritis due to the dissolution of fixing cement, the appearance of caries on the tooth surface not covered with veneer, and the subsequent change in the optical properties of the veneer in the projection of the tooth hard tissue dimensionalization. For this reason, the multicomponent concept of performance characteristics of double-cured composite cements requires further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Information Aspects of Medicine (Prikladnye informacionnye aspekty mediciny)Same topicInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsFrench-language works237,207